南阳师范学院学报

在20世纪90代以来的中国生态文学中，苇岸散文一直备受赞誉。这种赞誉既出于对苇岸作品“文学性”的认可，更出于对苇岸本人“生态殉道者”形象的尊崇。如果纯粹“就文论文”,则应该实事求是地承认，苇岸的生态叙事存在不少偏误。特别是“今不如昔”的文化保守主义观念、以文人雅士的局外人身份对底层社会的浪漫化想象，以及偏离“以人为本”理念的生态中心主义立场，尤其值得商榷。这些偏误的产生，很大程度上与苇岸过于机械地移植西方生态理念而未能基于“中国经验”进行本土化转化有关。

Since the 1990s, Wei An's prose has been highly praised in Chinese ecological literature. This praise stems not only from the recognition of the “literary quality” of Wei An's works, but also from the respect for Wei An's own image as an “ecological martyr”. If it is merely a “literary paper”, it should be admitted in a realistic manner that there are many biases in Wei An's ecological narrative. In particular, the cultural conservatism concept of “the present being inferior to the past”, the romanticized imagination of the lower class as an outsider from the perspective of scholars and literati, and the ecological centrism stance that deviates from the “people-oriented” concept are especially questionable. The emergence of these biases is largely related to Wei An's excessive mechanical transplantation of Western ecological concepts and failure to localize and transform them based on the “Chinese experience”.